Secret Code For Kindergartners

How dumb is this?

‘Pizza’ Party Codeword May Have Doomed CIA Spies

All the CIA’s Lebanon spies wanted was a slice. What they got, allegedly, was a big intelligence failure.

Hezbollah may have just rolled up the CIA’s network of spies devoted to cracking the secrets of the Lebanese Shiite extremist group. If so, it’s because of one of the stupidest, least secure code words in history.

According to ABC News, Hezbollah operatives figured out that CIA informants who had infiltrated the Iranian proxy group were meeting with their agency handlers at a Beirut Pizza Hut. How could Hezbollah deduce that location? “The CIA used the codeword ‘PIZZA’ when discussing where to meet with the agents,” ABC reports.

See also:
Exclusive: CIA Spies Caught, Fear Execution in Middle East
CIA in Lebanon damaged by capture of spies by Hezbollah
The Pizza Hut Connection: CIA Exposes Own Spies in Iran and Lebanon
CIA’s ‘pizza’ blunders leave informants facing execution
Iran and Hezbollah Caught All the CIA Spies at Pizza Hut
Iran and Hezbollah Caught CIA Spies at a Pizza Hut in Beirut
American ‘Pizza Hut’ Spies Captured in Lebanon
CIA informants in Iran, Lebanon outed over ‘pizza code-word’ blunders
Hezbollah unraveling CIA spy network in Lebanon
CIA spy ring busted in Iran and Lebanon
Reports: U.S. Operatives Caught In Lebanon, Iran
White House: No Comment on Spies Outed in Iran, Lebanon
Hezbollah uncovers CIA informants
CIA spies captured in Lebanon
‘CIA spies busted in Iran, Lebanon’

What were they thinking? It’s unfortunate that people working for us have or are about to lose their lives over something this stupid and easily avoidable. Not only is it extremely damaging to our intelligence gathering efforts, but it’s also going to have a chilling effect on future recruitment efforts. Seriously, who wants to work for amateurs, especially if your life depends on it?

/taking the intelligence out of Central Intelligence Agency

Advertisements

First Comes The Trial Balloon . . .

How many times did we hear this claptrap during the campaign?

And you believed him? Well, guess what?

Geithner, Summers hedge on tax hikes

Wavering on an emphatic promise he made in the spring, top White House economic adviser Lawrence H. Summers would not rule out middle-class tax increases Sunday as a way for the Obama administration to pay for a sweeping health care plan.

The statement, which was echoed by Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner on Sunday’s talk shows, pries open a door to the kinds of broad tax increases that Mr. Obama opposed in his campaign and that he and his advisers have ruled out since taking office in January.

In March, Mr. Summers told CNBC emphatically, “Let’s be very clear. … There are no, no tax increases this year. There are no, no tax increases next year.”

On Sunday, however, Mr. Summers, the director of the National Economic Council, was much more circumspect, saying that circumstances change and options cannot be ruled out.

“There is a lot, though, there is a lot that can happen over time,” Mr. Summers said when pressed on CBS’ “Face the Nation” about whether the Obama administration would raise taxes on the middle class to cover the massive planned expansion of federal health care coverage and the ballooning federal deficits.

“It’s never a good idea to absolutely rule things out no matter what,” Mr. Summers said, elaborating by saying the administration would not act in ways that would be funded “primarily” by the middle class.

“But what the president has been completely clear on is that he is not going to pursue any of his priorities – not health care, not energy, nothing – in ways that are primarily burdening middle-class families,” he said.

Mr. Geithner spoke similarly, declining to rule out broadly based tax increases, when pressed during an interview that aired Sunday. ABC’s George Stephanopoulos invited Mr. Geithner five times to rule out raising taxes to pay for health care reform and/or to close the budget deficit – and he never did.

“Again, we’re not at the point yet where we’re going to make a judgment about what it’s going to take,” Mr. Geithner said on ABC’s “This Week.”

When asked about tax increases, “you’re not ruling it out, you can’t rule it out,” Mr. Geithner responded: “I think that what the country needs to do is understand we’re going to have to do what it takes. We’re going to do what’s necessary.”

See also:
Econ chief Timothy Geithner won’t rule out middle class tax increases
CQ Transcript: Economic Council’s Summers on CBS’s ‘Face the Nation’
On their way to summer vacation..
Will Barack Obama tax middle classes? U.S. finance chiefs flag tough measures to tackle growing budget deficit
2 Obama officials: No guarantee taxes won’t go up
Geithner, Summers Sent To The Corner Over Tax Bungle
AP ENTERPRISE: Federal tax revenues plummeting
Tax Receipts Fall Off Cliff; Worst Drop Since Depression

Of course today, they’re furiously spinning away, trying to reel the trial balloon back in, like it wasn’t floated on purpose.

No middle-class tax increases, White House insists

Despite warnings from President Obama’s top economic advisers that new taxes for middle-income Americans cannot be ruled out, the White House insisted today that the president’s “commitment” to a campaign pledge to avert new taxes for those earning less than $250,000 a year holds firm.

Both Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and chief economic adviser Lawrence Summers had suggested during appearances on the Sunday morning news talk shows that tax increases could not be ruled out for Americans earning less than the threshold that the president has set.

But White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs adamantly and repeatedly insisted today that the president remains committed to his pledge — though he was unable to explain why Geithner and Summers had strayed from the administration’s line.

“The president’s clear commitment is not to raise taxes on those making less than $250,000 a year,” Gibbs told reporters pressing for an explanation about apparent discrepancies in the White House’s message.

Gibbs added, “I hope you’ll take my reiteration of this clear commitment . . . in the clearest terms possible, that he is not raising taxes on those who make less than $250,000 a year.”

The president, arguing that the healthcare overhaul he is seeking will not only benefit the public but also help control runaway government spending, has said that he will support tax increases to support his plan only for the wealthiest Americans, those earning more than $250,000.

Right. One thing that cannot happen by accident in Washington, is both top administration economic officials going on the major Sunday talk shows, on the same day, delivering the same message, that middle class taxes increases are on the table, without express marching orders from the White House to deliver it. Gimme a break, how dumb do they think we are?

/the numbers just don’t add up, tax revenue collection is plummeting and the rich don’t have close to enough money to pay for all of Obama’s reckless deficit spending, the money has to come from somewhere

Living In Bizarro World

Study: Network coverage biased toward GOP

The major U.S. broadcasters demonstrated bias towards Republicans in their coverage of presidential campaigns between 1992 and 2004, a new book contends.

Maria Elizabeth Grabe and Erik Bucy, both associate professors of telecommunications at Indiana University, are the authors of “Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections” published by Oxford University Press. They analyzed coverage of the elections on ABC, CBS and NBC and concluded all three networks showed a slight tilt to the Republican side.

“We don’t think this is journalists conspiring to favor Republicans. We think they’re just so beat up and tired of being accused of a liberal bias that they unknowingly give Republicans the benefit in coverage,” said Grabe. “It’s self-censorship that journalists might be imposing on themselves.”

/talk about revisionist history, these wacademics are just flat out nuts