These Are Not The Drones You Seek

Mission creep, what mission creep? Who are you going to believe, Robert Gates and Obama or your own lying eyes? Why, exactly, are we in Libya again?

U.S. will deploy Predators in Libya

President Barack Obama has given U.S. forces the go-ahead to use armed Predator drones in Libya after forces loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi changed their tactics in the fighting there, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced Thursday.

“It’s an evolving situation. We saw an opportunity here and recommended it to the president. He took it,” Gates told reporters at a Pentagon briefing.

However, Gates said the use of the drones did not indicate that the U.S. was being sucked back into a military campaign that Obama has promised will be handled chiefly by other NATO countries and allied forces.

“This is a very limited addition on our part, but it does provide some additional capabilities to NATO,” Gates said. “I don’t think there’s mission creep at all….The primary strike role has been turned over to our allies, our friends.”

Now remember boys and girls, providing “additional capabilities to NATO” is not, I repeat, IS NOT mission creep. Um, it’s been at least a couple months now, whatever happened to “days, not weeks”?

See also:
U.S. begins using Predator drones in Libya
U.S. Launches Drone Strikes in Libya
Obama authorizes Predator drone strikes in Libya
US deploys armed drones over Libya
Obama Approves Use of Predator Drones in Libya
U.S. Sends Predators to Strike Qaddafi Troops Fighting Rebels
Libya: US sends armed drones to shield rebels
Pentagon: Robot War Over Libya Begins in 3, 2, 1 …
US begins using armed drones in Libya
U.S. introduces armed Predator drones in Libya

Of course, the U.N. resolution we’re operating under only authorizes humanitarian efforts, so I’m sure these armed Predator drones will only be used to deliver food to civilians and stuff like that.

The Council stressed the need to intensify efforts to find a solution to the crisis that responded to the legitimate demands of the Libyan people, noting actions being taken on the diplomatic front in that regard. It further demanded that Libyan authorities comply with their obligations under international law and take all measures to protect civilians and meet their basic needs and to ensure the rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian assistance.

In that connection, the Council specified that the flight ban would not apply to flights that had as their sole purpose humanitarian aid, the evacuation of foreign nationals, enforcing the ban or other purposes “deemed necessary for the benefit of the Libyan people”.

I don’t know, what supposedly started out as a limited “kinetic military action” sure as hell seems to have blossomed over the weeks into the United States and NATO openly taking sides in a Libyan civil war.

/how is that not mission creep?

Advertisements

Are The Oil Ticks Becoming Just Plain Ticks?

Can you imagine what would become of the arrogant, terror financing, Wahhabi Saudi royal family if they ran out of oil? Seriously, besides exporting oil and terrorism, does Saudi Arabia have any beneficial, redeeming global purpose or value?

Have Saudis Overstated How Much Oil Is Left?

While the world remains transfixed by the Egyptian revolt, a crisis with equally profound global consequences is quietly brewing elsewhere in the Middle East: WikiLeaks this week released U.S. diplomatic cables suggesting that Saudi Arabia may have vastly overstated its oil reserves — if true, that could dramatically accelerate the arrival of the long-feared “peak oil” moment, when oil production hits its final high before slowly declining, keeping prices rising for the foreseeable future and slowing global economic growth. But not all industry analysts are convinced by the claims in the cables.

The diplomatic cables from the U.S. embassy in Riyadh between 2007 and 2009 cite a former senior executive of Saudi Arabia’s state-run Aramco oil company as revealing to American officials that the country’s official estimate of 716 billion barrels of oil reserves is, well, hogwash; the real figure is about 40% lower than that, according to the oil executive, Sadad al-Husseini, a geologist who until 2004 headed Aramco’s exploration department — a seemingly impeccable source. WikiLeaks released the four cables on Tuesday.

See also:
WikiLeaks cable: Saudi oil estimates may have been exaggerated
WikiLeaks: Saudi Arabia Overstated Its Oil Reserves
WikiLeaks: Saudi oil reserves overstated
WikiLeaks cables: Saudi Arabia cannot pump enough oil to keep a lid on prices
Saudi Oil Reserves and the WikiLeaks Chinese Whispers Effect
Wikileaks gives a boost to peak oil theories UPDATED
Dwindling reserves
Is Saudi Arabia running out of oil?
The Truth Behind Saudi Arabia’s Oil Supply
Ex-Saudi Oil Executive: “Oil Reserve Data is False”

Oh sure, it’s still going to be a while before the Saudis run out of oil and their country reverts back to being just another third world [expletive deleted]hole, but now that day might be coming almost twice as soon as previously estimated.

/of course, we can hasten the onset of Saudi irrelevance if we can use our technology to develop substitutes for their oil

Sure, Why Not, What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

What the [expletive deleted] is Obama doing?

U.S. open to a role for Islamists in new Egypt government

The Obama administration said for the first time that it supports a role for groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, a banned Islamist organization, in a reformed Egyptian government.

The organization must reject violence and recognize democratic goals if the U.S. is to be comfortable with it taking part in the government, the White House said. But by even setting conditions for the involvement of such nonsecular groups, the administration took a surprise step in the midst of the crisis that has enveloped Egypt for the last week.

Seriously, Obama thinks the Muslim Brotherhood is going to reject violence and recognize democratic goals, really? Has the Obama or any of his clown posse ever heard of taqiyya?

Muslim Brotherhood: ‘Prepare Egyptians for war with Israel’

A leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt told the Arabic-language Iranian news network Al-Alam on Monday that he would like to see the Egyptian people prepare for war against Israel, according to the Hebrew-language business newspaper Calcalist.

Muhammad Ghannem reportedly told Al- Alam that the Suez Canal should be closed immediately, and that the flow of gas from Egypt to Israel should cease “in order to bring about the downfall of the Mubarak regime.” He added that “the people should be prepared for war against Israel,” saying the world should understand that “the Egyptian people are prepared for anything to get rid of this regime.”

Now does that sound like the Muslim Brotherhood is going to reject violence and recognize democratic goals to you? Just how naive or stupid or both is the Obama administration? Unreal!

See also:
The Muslim Brotherhood may gain power in Egypt by default
Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood eyes unity gov’t without Mubarak
Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood mutes its religious message for protests
Muslim Brotherhood supports protests
The Muslim Brotherhood on the March
Muslim Brotherhood Plays Key Role In Egypt Unrest
Editorial: Terror In Waiting
Just What Is The Muslim Brotherhood?
Profile: Mohammed Badie, leader of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood
The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website
Muslim Brotherhood

So, let me get this straight, Obama has no problem with a banned terrorist group, parent organization of al Qaeda, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc., an enemy sworn to wipe Israel off the map and overthrow the United States, coming to power in Egypt?

Obama will go down in history as the president who lost Egypt, not to mention the rest of the Middle East and who knows what else.

/all I can say is God help us all and deliver us from these Obama morons