Obama Lied, Your Health Care Plan Died

Remember this talking point, repeated ad nauseam?

Well, guess what, are you sitting down? Obama lied, what a shocka!

Friday night news dump: White House says 51 percent of company health plans won’t meet Obamacare guidelines

At Investor’s Business Daily, Sean Higgins and David Hogberg have a doozy of a story:

Internal White House documents reveal that 51% of employers may have to relinquish their current health care coverage by 2013 due to ObamaCare. That numbers soars to 66% for small-business employers.

The documents — product of a joint project of the Labor Department, the Health and Human Services Department and the IRS — examine the effects new regulations would have on existing, or “grandfathered,” employer-based health care plans.

Draft copies of the documents were reportedly leaked to House Republicans earlier in the week. Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., posted them on his Web site Friday afternoon. (View the full report here.)

The Associated Press is also on the story. Even they can’t ignore the dishonesty that was used to sell the health care overhaul:

Over and over in the health care debate, President Barack Obama said people who like their current coverage would be able to keep it.

But an early draft of an administration regulation estimates that many employers will be forced to make changes to their health plans under the new law. In just three years, a majority of workers — 51 percent — will be in plans subject to new federal requirements, according to the draft.

See also:
Administration: 51% Of Companies’ Health Plans Won’t Pass Muster
Health overhaul to force changes in employer plans
Health-care rules may force some to change coverage, leaked document suggests
Draft Health Rules Set Hurdles
Keep Your Health Plan Under Overhaul? Probably Not, Gov’t Analysis Concludes
Health overhaul to force employer plan changes
ObamaCare Vindication Watch: Majority of Workers Will Have to Change Health Coverage
Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Well, Obama and the Democrats passed Obamacare without reading it and now we’re sure as hell finding out what’s in it and it’s getting worse by the day.

/hey, you [expletive deleted] up, you elected them

Advertisements

Welcome To Europe, Sneaking In On the Down Low

Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan: Betsy McCaughey

The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.

But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.”

Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far.

New Penalties

Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541)

What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the “tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make.

The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

Elderly Hardest Hit

Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.

Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464).

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.

In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It took almost three years of public protests before the board reversed its decision.

See also:
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
National Coordinator of Health Information Technology
Comparative Effectiveness Language In Stimulus Bill Raises Concerns
Stimulus Math for the GOP

So, the Democrats deviously thought they could hide this paving stone in the road to socialized medicine deep inside their 800 page Porkapalooza and no one would notice.

/not only is this dishonest tactic frightening, BUT IT’S ALSO NOTHING EVEN REMOTELY RESEMBLING WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE CALLED “STIMULUS”!